<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hack Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/</link>
	<description>Fashion and Lifestyle Advice for Men</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jmc</title>
		<link>http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/comment-page-1/#comment-127095</link>
		<dc:creator>jmc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/#comment-127095</guid>
		<description>I do rather like the blue thread selection for the buttons. Subtle but a bit whimsical. I wish I had thought of it.

Lately we see abominations such as striped suits with striped shirts and striped ties in the Brooks Brothers ads. You&#039;d think that being English owned would IMPROVE the place.

I wrote a letter to William Safire bemoaning the actual death of Brooks Brothers. It was the day I received a catalogue featuring a formal shirt with a &quot;wing tip collar.&quot; The funny thing was, the collar had neither a big running board Goodyear welt, nor a series of little perforated designs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do rather like the blue thread selection for the buttons. Subtle but a bit whimsical. I wish I had thought of it.</p>
<p>Lately we see abominations such as striped suits with striped shirts and striped ties in the Brooks Brothers ads. You&#8217;d think that being English owned would IMPROVE the place.</p>
<p>I wrote a letter to William Safire bemoaning the actual death of Brooks Brothers. It was the day I received a catalogue featuring a formal shirt with a &#8220;wing tip collar.&#8221; The funny thing was, the collar had neither a big running board Goodyear welt, nor a series of little perforated designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff the Baptist</title>
		<link>http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/comment-page-1/#comment-118121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff the Baptist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/#comment-118121</guid>
		<description>Eh, who cares about cuff buttons?  2, 3, 5, who&#039;s really looking?  Certainly not me.  They&#039;re a vestigial decoration anyway, much like the lowest button on the coat.  I did like the fact that his coat cuffs are actually functional though.  That is a detail you rarely see these days.  It isn&#039;t flashy, but it is a nice subtle mark of quality.

But the reporter really doesn&#039;t know how to dress himself.  From the initial article, I thought he was just wearing earthy pink shirt to spice up the check on the suit.  But a closer look says something different and far more awful.  If it doesn&#039;t look good at conversation distance then well it simply doesn&#039;t look good.  He just has pattern overload.  You don&#039;t use that gingham with the check along with that geometric number from the pocket square.  Not unless you have something to tie them together, which he doesn&#039;t.  Too much, sir.  Far too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, who cares about cuff buttons?  2, 3, 5, who&#8217;s really looking?  Certainly not me.  They&#8217;re a vestigial decoration anyway, much like the lowest button on the coat.  I did like the fact that his coat cuffs are actually functional though.  That is a detail you rarely see these days.  It isn&#8217;t flashy, but it is a nice subtle mark of quality.</p>
<p>But the reporter really doesn&#8217;t know how to dress himself.  From the initial article, I thought he was just wearing earthy pink shirt to spice up the check on the suit.  But a closer look says something different and far more awful.  If it doesn&#8217;t look good at conversation distance then well it simply doesn&#8217;t look good.  He just has pattern overload.  You don&#8217;t use that gingham with the check along with that geometric number from the pocket square.  Not unless you have something to tie them together, which he doesn&#8217;t.  Too much, sir.  Far too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/comment-page-1/#comment-117859</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/#comment-117859</guid>
		<description>The red gingham is way too strong for the Prince of Wales. The suit fabric is an elegant, in a way, very forward fabric on its own. There is no need for the bold red gingham - it looks amateurish and a bit too cheeky. Now, if you wanted to go with a gingham or some other check (tattersall, etc.) then a more traditional blue would blend well, and really work WITH the PoW fabric, as opposed to against it.

As far as the 5 buttons of the cuff goes - what more is there to say. I&#039;m all for experimentation and individuality, but why spend the time and expense on bespoke when what you really want is a designer trend piece? Its like getting spinning mags put on your &#039;66 Aston Martin - sure, they&#039;re both cool (in their own way) but just not together.

But, to each their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The red gingham is way too strong for the Prince of Wales. The suit fabric is an elegant, in a way, very forward fabric on its own. There is no need for the bold red gingham &#8211; it looks amateurish and a bit too cheeky. Now, if you wanted to go with a gingham or some other check (tattersall, etc.) then a more traditional blue would blend well, and really work WITH the PoW fabric, as opposed to against it.</p>
<p>As far as the 5 buttons of the cuff goes &#8211; what more is there to say. I&#8217;m all for experimentation and individuality, but why spend the time and expense on bespoke when what you really want is a designer trend piece? Its like getting spinning mags put on your &#8216;66 Aston Martin &#8211; sure, they&#8217;re both cool (in their own way) but just not together.</p>
<p>But, to each their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoyo</title>
		<link>http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/comment-page-1/#comment-117835</link>
		<dc:creator>yoyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolomen.com/2007/08/23/hack-work/#comment-117835</guid>
		<description>Hm, i disagree. The gigham is between the large blue overcheck and the smaller base patter on the suit. I think it works well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, i disagree. The gigham is between the large blue overcheck and the smaller base patter on the suit. I think it works well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
